In the United States, the legal system is straining under compounding pressures—intensified immigration enforcement, unstable legal aid funding, and deepening disconnection from public institutions. This breakdown is not merely procedural; it erodes the civic infrastructure that sustains participation in democratic life. 

This crisis demands that legal designers look beyond usability fixes and service delivery improvements. It calls for a deeper reckoning with how law is experienced—as exclusion, fear, and civic invisibility. This reality poses a profound challenge for the fields of law and design. 

 A new dissertation by Jules Rochielle Sievert urges a reimagining of legal design from the perspective of those most excluded from it. We are facing a civil justice crisis that is both structural and civic in nature. 

Sievert introduces a new framework, Transformative Transdisciplinary Legal Design (TTLD), which offers a set of new theoretical lenses applied to legal design. It treats law as co-produced civic knowledge rather than a professional service, advances peer-led legal empowerment and collective legal authorship, and grounds legal design in place-based, cultural, and community-driven practice. Drawing from spatial justice, critical legal empowerment, participatory action research, ontological design, and posthumanism, TTLD reimagines legal systems as civic, relational, and co-created rather than merely procedural or service oriented. It positions justice-centered design to confront structural inequality, civic disenfranchisement, and the spatialized effects of policy violence 

Sievert states, “Law is not a fixed system but a dynamic, relational force, one that shapes how we experience and navigate the world, and one we can reshape through how we respond. Law is a living system, evolving through collective care, conflict, and transformation. But it also carries violence, structural, procedural, and often invisible. This violence is felt in the body—through stress, displacement, and survival—and embedded in place, shaped by politics and neighborhood life, housing, and space. However, agency is our capacity to respond to these forces. It is fortified through relationships—how we listen, organize, and share power, agency is also carried through story and memory, which hold histories of harm, resilience, and resistance. “

 The dissertation includes a case-based analysis from the East Boston Spatial Justice Lab (https://www.nulawlab.org/projects/the-east-boston-spatial-justice-lab) where TTLD was implemented through learning pods, participatory design sessions, popular education, and community-led research. Together, these strategies created new civic spaces for residents to author legal meaning, assert housing justice claims, and reimagine what “access to justice” means.

“Design can’t be neutral when systems are broken by design,” says Sievert. “We need legal infrastructures that are co-authored with communities, not imposed upon them.”

As one of the first scholars to graduate from Northeastern University’s PhD program in Interdisciplinary Design and Media with a focus on civic legal empowerment, Sievert’s work lays a foundation for legal transformation in the face of widespread civil justice failures.  

Their model has already begun influencing legal empowerment efforts, policy training programs, and grassroots organizing across the region.

Image Caption: East Boston Spatial Justice Lab 2025, Photo credits, Jules Rochielle and Gabriela Cartagena 

NOTE: Please credit Jules Rochielle Sievert and the East Boston Spatial Justice Lab in any coverage. For more information, refer to the dissertation (Chapter 4 and 5 cover the participatory case study), or contact Jules at: [[email protected]]. 

TTLD Core Arguments with Quotes and References