AI at CAMD

John Wihbey, Nikita Roy, Cansu Canca and Joanna Weiss talk about the trust issues around AI as part of the AI Literacy Lab panel, Tuesday, Oct. 17, 2023, in Boston, MA. (Photo by Heather Wang)

Human experience is the starting point for critical and creative practices of making across the College of Arts, Media and Design: making the built environment, designing expressive artifacts, sharing performances, or storytelling through news and media, for example.

These practices are being reshaped by advances in data-driven approaches and AI technology, and CAMD faculty bring a range of perspectives and expertise to that reshaping. In particular, research and teaching in CAMD advances understanding of:

  • How data are made: Data are produced through practices of making, partitioning, compartmentalizing, seeing, representing, etc. An experiential (i.e. practice-based) understanding of how data are created, situated, and used reveals that data are not something given from the world or necessarily indexically connected to it, but are constructed artifacts worth critical investigation.
  • How AI and data are interactive: A core strength of CAMD disciplines is their emphasis on process and practice. By emphasizing the interactive nature of data and AI – understanding data as constructed artifacts situated in human contexts, and engaging with AI as a technology that is actively shaped through our encounters with it and that shapes how we interact with data – CAMD disciplines can privilege a process- and practice-oriented approach that is frequently unaccounted for in other disciplines.
  • How to be critical users of AI: Critical evaluation of AI tools and systems is essential to bypassing the hype and doomsday predictions surrounding AI. As a college of disciplines focused on critical and creative practice, expanding the range of human experience, and holding power to account, we approach these tools with an open mind but a critical eye for the ways that technologies may “flatten” human experience and diversity, compromise matters of authority and intellectual property in cultural industries, and unfairly exploit human labor, materials, and artifacts for economic or political advantage.
  • How to be creative users of AI: AI is both one more tool in the long human history of world-making, and a novel set of capacities to be explored. While AI cannot automate creativity, it can be part of creative workflows and aid brainstorming, prototyping and ideating. CAMD faculty experiment with the benefits and limitations of using computational processes in creative and critically reflexive ways.

Read here about some of the courses, research and initiatives CAMD faculty are leading in AI.

Publications

Rahul Bhargava, Amanda Brea, Victoria Palacin, Laura Perovich and Jesse Hinson, “Data Theatre as an Entry Point to Data Literacy” Educational Technology & Society, Vol. 25, No. 4 (October 2022) https://www.jstor.org/stable/48695984

Rahul BhargavaCommunity Data: Creative Approaches to Empowering People with Information (Oxford University Press 2024) https://global.oup.com/academic/product/community-data-9780198911630

S. Lee, Myo Chung, N. Kim, S.M. Jones-Jang, N. Krämer, & R. McEwen “Public Perceptions of ChatGPT: Exploring How Nonexperts Evaluate Its Risks and Benefits” Technology, Mind, and Behavior, 5(4: Winter 2024) https://tmb.apaopen.org/pub/ki45ziga/release/1

Jun Yuan, Brian Barr, Kyle Overton, Enrico Bertini, “Visual Exploration of Machine Learning Model Behavior with Hierarchical Surrogate Rule Sets” https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9937064

S. Lenzi, G. Terenghi, D. Meacci, A. Moreno Fernandez-de-Leceta, Paolo Ciuccarelli, “The Design of Datascapes: Toward a Design Framework for Sonification for Anomaly Detection in AI-supported Networked Environments” https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/computer-science/articles/10.3389/fcomp.2023.1254678/full

Tucker J. Marion, Mohsen Moghaddam, Paolo Ciuccarelli and Lu Wang, “AI for User-Centered New Product Development—from Large-Scale Need Elicitation to Generative Design” https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/the-pdma-handbook/9781119890218/c22.xhtml

Grisha Coleman, Brenda McCaffrey, “The Movement Undercommons: Movement Analysis as Meaning Making in a Time of Global Migrations” https://isea-archives.siggraph.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/2018_Coleman_etal_The_Movement_Undercommons.pdf

Derek Curry, “Artistic Defamiliarization in the Age of Algorithmic Prediction” https://direct.mit.edu/leon/article-abstract/56/2/177/113466/Artistic-Defamiliarization-in-the-Age-of

Smit Desai, Michal Twidale, “Using Playful Metaphors to Conceptualize Practical Use of ChatGPT: An Autoethnography” https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/pra2.816

Demi Fang, Sophia V. Kuhn, Walter Kaufmann, Michael A. Kraus, Caitlin Mueller, “Quantifying the influence of continuous and discrete design decisions using sensitivities,” https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111162683-031

Laura Forlano and Itziar Barrio, “From Data Doubles to Data Demons” https://muse.jhu.edu/article/926028

Nabeel Gillani, Rebecca Eynon, Catherine Chiabaut and Kelsey Finkel, “Unpacking the ‘Black Box’ of AI in Education” https://www.j-ets.net/collection/published-issues/26_1

Jennifer Gradecki, Derek Curry, “Crowd-Sourced Intelligence Agency: Prototyping Counterveillance,” https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2053951717693259

Jennifer Gradecki, “The Critical Counterpoints of Dataveillance Artists” https://direct.mit.edu/leon/article-abstract/56/2/164/113458/The-Critical-Counterpoints-of-Dataveillance

Chenyan Jia, Martin J. Riedl & Samuel Wolley, “Promises and Perils of Automated Journalism” https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2289881

Adriana Alvarado Garcia, Christopher Le Dantec, “Quotidian Report: Grassroots Data Practices to Address Public Safety” https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3274286

Clifford Lee and Elisabeth Soep, Code for What? Computer Science for Storytelling and Social Justice https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262047456/code-for-what/

Jun Liu and Chuncheng Liu, “The Politics of Governance by Quantification Infrastructure” https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/08969205241298291

Deirdre LoughridgeSounding Human: Music and Machines 1740/2020, “Coda: Learning Machines” https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo208042715.html

Dietmar Offenhuber, “Shapes and Frictions of Synthetic Data” https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20539517241249390

Carlos Sandoval Olascoaga, “Painting with Data: Visually based open-source tool for geo-computing” https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/23998083231193321

Travis Lloyd, Joseph Reagle, Mor Naaman, “’There Has to Be a Lot That We’re Missing’: Moderating AI-Generated Content on Reddit” https://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.12702

Mariel Pettee, Chase Shimmin, Douglas Duhamie, Ilya Vidrin, “Beyond Imitation: Generative and Variational Choreography via Machine Learning” https://computationalcreativity.net/iccc2019/papers/iccc19-paper-51.pdf

Zhouran Lu, Dakuo Wang, Ming Yin “Does More Advice Help? The Effects of Second Opinions in AI-Assisted Decision Making” https://dl-acm-org.ezproxy.neu.edu/doi/abs/10.1145/3653708

John Wihbey, “AI and Epistemic Risk for Democracy: A Coming Crisis of Public Knowledge?” https://ssrn.com/abstract=4805026

John Wihbey, Garrett Morrow, “Social Media’s New Referees?: Public Attitudes Toward AI Content Moderation Bots Across Three Countries” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4660772

Learn more about CAMD research and innovation